Social media offers new opportunities for engaging the public. ACUS is working on recommendations about social media in rulemaking, based on a Consultant's Report by Professor Michael Herz of Cardozo School of Law. You can follow, and be part of, this process here.
An initial draft of the recommendations was open for public discussion until November 6, when the Committee on Rulemaking considered possible changes. This meeting produced a revised draft. You'll able to review and discuss Committee Draft 2 here until the Committee's next meeting on November 13. All the Committee's changes will be in the Plenary Draft, to be debated at the 59th ACUS Plenary Session on December 5. You'll be able to review and discuss the Plenary Draft here until November 27 . Comments and discussion on RecommendationRoom will be part of what ACUS considers when deciding to adopt final recommendations, along with comments submitted to ACUS on their project page.
Committee Draft 1 Pre-Rulemaking and Policy Development
6. Agencies should consider using social media during pre-rulemaking or policy development proceedings where the goal is to understand the current state of affairs, collect dispersed knowledge, or identify problems. To enhance the amount and value of public input, an agency seeking to engage the public for these purposes should, to the maximum extent possible, make clear the sort of information it is seeking, clarify the role of public comment, and directly engage with participants by acknowledging submissions, asking follow-up questions, and providing substantive responses.
Read the Consultant's Report on Gathering Open-Ended Public Input Through Social Media.
7. Agencies should consider using social media in support of retrospective review of existing regulations, particularly to learn what actual experience has been under the relevant regulation(s).
Read the Consultant's Report: Retrospective Review of Existing Regulations.